Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Wadena v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2022cv00227
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Wadena
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wadena v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP I
as 5:2021cv00490
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Wadena
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAQUE v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv06025
Defendant:
STEARNS, BOB JOHNSON, B LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE LAQUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadena v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2020cv00611
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Wadena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HILL v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
as 3:2020cv05814
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00073
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Nelson
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NELSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF OF CLASSIFICATION, DAWN CASE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. State Of Florida et al
as 3:2018cv01064
Defendant:
State Of Florida, John Tanner and Richard Robin Strickler
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shellito v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Shellito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haney v. Jones et al
as 8:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Haney
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Jennifer Folsom, Muhammad Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
