Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Erskine et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine, Lateef Dickerson, Matthew Hoskins and others
Defendant:
Truman Mears, Joseph Beck, Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Attorney General of the State of Delaware
as 1:2019cv00235
Petitioner:
Robert Moody
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Warden of Howard R. Young Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Leonard M. Taylor
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, City of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00146
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, City Of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mary Moody, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. MHM Services et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
MHM Services, Ben Griffiths, Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Fink et al
as 1:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Ken Fink, Moody, Phillip Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Williams , Allen Pedrick , R. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nevone Stinson
Defendant:
G. Williams , Allen Pedrick , R. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Moody et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Moody , R. Charles and Carl C. Danberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
