Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Stinson, Mark v. Fowlkes et al
as 1:2024cv22831
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Damon K. Griffin and Nathan P. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry, Nathan v. A. Orr
as 1:2024cv22383
Defendant:
A. Orr
Plaintiff:
Nathan Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyatt v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv22096
Defendant:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan Pyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County et al
as 0:2024cv60132
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Fillmore
Defendant:
State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County, Michael J. Satz, Christina Strandell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Curry v. Miami Dade County et al
as 1:2023cv24506
Plaintiff:
Nathan Curry
Defendant:
Miami Dade County and A. Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2023cv02468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, Detective Nathan Leathers, Detective Eric S. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldridge v. Lenninger et al
as 8:2023cv01922
Plaintiff:
Ricky Nathan Baldridge
Defendant:
Lenninger and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENORE v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
NATHAN PATRICK BENORE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN THOMAS, SERGEANT THOMPSON, SERGEANT PAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lane et al
as 3:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Nathan J. Davis
Defendant:
Lane, V. Pope-Jones and Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemingway v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00436
Petitioner:
John Nathan Hemingway
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
