Cases 1 - 10 of 36
SEARCY v. BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SEARCY
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED, TOMMY FORD, RICK ANGLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTEN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 4:2019cv00021
Defendant:
FAIRCHILD, UNITED STATES, LANGFORD and others
Plaintiff:
ERNESTINE COTTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bracero v. Scretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv20192
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Molina Bracero
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Rodfredrick Newell , Darlene Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEVINS v. JONES et al
as 4:2016cv00790
Plaintiff:
SHONDOLYN ROCHELLE BLEVINS
Defendant:
T A JONES, COLEMAN, FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Snider et al
as 2:2015cv14415
Petitioner:
Nairn D. Newell
Respondent:
D. Snider, Inspector Carter, K. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Martin Correctional Institution
as 2:2014cv14475
Plaintiff:
Nairn D. Newell
Defendant:
Martin Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWELL v. CREWS et al
as 1:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
PAUL TIMOTHY NEWELL
Defendant:
M HICKS, M DE LACERNA, RIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Norris, Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Norris et al
as 3:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis, Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
