Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Newton v. Akkad et al
as 2:2020cv01980
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center and T. Akkad
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Akkad et al
as 2:2020cv01402
Plaintiff:
Anthony Newton
Defendant:
T Akkad, Sgt Ebnetter, Clark County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton, Jr. v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv00826
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and B. Williams
Petitioner:
Charles Newton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Dzurenda
as 2:2018cv00508
Defendant:
James Dzurenda
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. County of Clark Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv03064
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, County of Clark Nevada, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Shelly J Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv02894
Defendant:
Michael G. Giles, Joseph Lombardo, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Shelly J Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv02038
Respondent:
Adam Paul Laxalt and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Charles Clinton Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01847
Defendant:
James Dzurenda and Brain Williams
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv01421
Defendant:
Anderson, Jerry Howell, Jennifer Nash and others
Plaintiff:
George Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Newton v. Devrenda et al
as 2:2016cv03017
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, James Devrenda and Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
