Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
John Miguel Swan
Respondent:
Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hicks v. Whitten
as 5:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Charles P Hicks
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bourque v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00887
Petitioner:
Armand P. Bourque
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Hudson v. Bridges
as 6:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
James P. Hudson
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francisco v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Serrano Quezada Francisco
Defendant:
Luke Pettigrew, N Brewer, R Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Taylor et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Isom Daniel Rogers, III
Defendant:
P D Taylor, Captain FNU Sedbrook, FNU Sedbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Ritchie et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Ralph Montula, Jason Ritchie, Amber Poindexter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Clark and Michael Paul Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Moses et al
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Vincent Dewayne Lewis
Defendant:
Sergant Shelia Moses, Micheal Brown, Sergant Patricia Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chilton v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00032
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Director DOC Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Charles P Chilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
