Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Morrison v. Biden
as 5:2024cv00274
Petitioner:
Phillip Morrison
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Arnett v. Gabriel et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Glen Delane Arnett, Jr
Defendant:
Major Phillip Gabriel, K Hamilton, Lt. J Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Hamilton
as 5:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Cole Isaac Phillips
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff et al
as 5:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Donna R Brandt
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, Terrace Dickerson, FNU Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luginbyhl v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv00939
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility, Darrell L Moore, Judge Phillip C Corley and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Bridges et al
as 4:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Barnett and Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Carrie Bridges, Capt. Charles Phillips, Tracie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Regaldo et al
as 4:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Christopher Phillips and Charles Christopher Wheeler
Defendant:
Vic Regaldo and Chaplin Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hancock v. Harpe
as 5:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hancock
Defendant:
Scott Crow and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
