Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Miller v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al.
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Miller
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Lt. Davis and Lt. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01494
Petitioner:
Jameer Pratt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Westley v. Harris et al
as 4:2021cv01672
Plaintiff:
James Westley
Defendant:
Warden Brandeshawn Harris, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Michael Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Grimm et al
as 3:2019cv01190
Defendant:
Facility Captain Hall, Corrections Officer Grimm, Corrections Officer Klemann and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Horn
as 1:2018cv00451
Defendant:
Daniel A Manion, Gregory Horn, Richard Posner and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Lawless et al.
as 2:2017cv01057
Plaintiff:
Arnold R Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Jeff Lawless, William Winters, Jonathan Spoljarik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Workman et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Jordan Workman , Jessica Barnes , Jasmine Bruce and others
Defendant:
City of Cleveland , Mayor of Cleveland and Chief of Police Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Ohio State of
as 1:2015cv00510
Petitioner:
Raymond Pratt
Respondent:
Ohio State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Pratt v. Voorhies
as 1:2007cv00825
Petitioner:
Reginald L. Pratt
Respondent:
Warden Voorhies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods et al v. Frederick et al
as 4:2007cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Woods, Mark Ferrell, Thomas C. Jenkins and others
Defendant:
K. Frederick, Terry J. Collins, D. Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
