Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv01696
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, TODD PERKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv03510
Defendant:
MISCHO, HALL, TARRA C. MUNNINGLY and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PERKINS et al
as 1:2019cv03168
Defendant:
TODD PERKINS, RACHEL PULLIAM, ELBERT GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2016cv02261
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ELBERT GRIFFIN, DOUGLAS CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02265
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID RENNER, DIANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN M. MISCHO, DUANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv02220
Plaintiff:
THOMAS K. JENKINS
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DIANE MAY, DAVID RENAER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAAC v. SAMUEL
as 1:2013cv01381
Plaintiff:
PRINCE ISAAC
Defendant:
CHARLES SAMUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
