Cases 1 - 10 of 74
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI and LALA MAHA MOQADDEM (REGRAGUI)
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, SHERRI BLUEBOND, PATRICIA GUERRERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2023cv03117
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv03605
Plaintiff:
CARLESE J. HALL
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, ARCOLA WASHINGTON-ADDUCI, PATRICIA V. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUGHES v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and MICHAEL CARVJAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. U.S. PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv02531
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE BOARD, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and JEQUAN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, JENNIFER DAVIS, JEQUAN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv03566
Defendant:
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, WILLIAM M. JACKSON, MARY LOU LEARY and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CHEEKS v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2020cv02200
Respondent:
LENNARD JOHNSON and PATRICIA CUSHWA
Petitioner:
DAVID CHEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
