Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith (PS) v. Persons et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Smith
Respondent:
Persons and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gottorff (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Respondent:
Moses Andre Stancil, Moses Andres Stancil, Richard Persons and others
Petitioner:
David J Gottorff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2022cv02081
Plaintiff:
Lottie Kathleen Elliott
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The, Local Authorities for CSPO Colorado Springs Police Department, The, Public Defender's Office, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chrisco v. Hughbanks et al
as 1:2018cv02550
Plaintiff:
Luke Irvin Chrisco
Defendant:
Shane Hughbanks, Siobahn Bartlow, Richard Persons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00956
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, David (I) Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnee Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Makeeta et al
as 1:2015cv01688
Plaintiff:
Paul Gonzales
Defendant:
Terry Makeeta, Sheriff, Kitchen personal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. USA et al
as 1:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Byron Tyrome Todd
Defendant:
USA, U.S. Person(s) and World Bank, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv02553
Plaintiff:
Jason Williams
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Tom Clements, Rae Timme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. Persons et al
as 1:2009cv00487
Plaintiff:
Elmer Marsh
Defendant:
Richard Persons, Richard (I) Persons and Renee Martinez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
