Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Peterson v. USA et al
as 5:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Stephen Desmund Peterson
Defendant:
USA, Hospital Administrator - Medical Department, Tom Goforth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chambers v. Trammell et al
as 6:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Timothy Chambers
Defendant:
Anita Trammell, Robert Patton, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Trammell et al
as 5:2014cv01343
Plaintiff:
Timothy Chambers
Defendant:
Anita Trammell, Robert Patton, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Sitzman et al
as 5:2009cv01132
Plaintiff:
Sonny Lauren Harmon, Sr
Defendant:
Richard R Sitzman, Tim D Kuykendall, Larry S Balcerak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyles v. Peterson et al
as 4:2008cv00250
Plaintiff:
Cody Earl Boyles
Defendant:
Pete Peterson and Justin Miller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Decker v. Peterson et al
as 6:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Decker
Defendant:
Pete Peterson, Oklahoma Department of Health and Clifford Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florie v. Peterson et al
as 6:2007cv00390
Plaintiff:
Bryant S. Florie
Defendant:
Pete Peterson and Cliff Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florie v. Miller et al
as 6:2007cv00368
Plaintiff:
Bryant S. Florie
Defendant:
John Miller, Bill Peterson and Joe Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. Callahan et al
as 5:2007cv00965
Plaintiff:
Delbert George Grant
Defendant:
Dennis Callahan, T C Peterson, Ken Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Peterson et al
as 5:2007cv00803
Petitioner:
Justin Ryan Long
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and T C Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
