Cases 1 - 10 of 165
(PC)Moten v. Pheiffer et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Christian Pheiffer, Miranda, Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Pratt
as 3:2023cv02175
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ponce v. Ramadan et al
as 1:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Pablo Jesus Ponce
Defendant:
Ramadan and Hitchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Castellon v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01408
Petitioner:
Javier Ponce Castellon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Donnell Young v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Donnell Tyrone Young
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark Marquesse, Felisha Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
B. Weaver, Justin Garcia, Adriana Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Efrain Diaz Ponce v. Merrick B. Garland
as 5:2022cv01751
Petitioner:
Efrain Diaz Ponce
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schlomo Schmuel v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2022cv07005
Petitioner:
Schlomo Schmuel
Respondent:
Felicia Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gary Douglas Abel v. Western Regional Office Director et al
as 2:2022cv06155
Plaintiff:
Gary Douglas Abel
Defendant:
Western Regional Office Director, Felicia Ponce, Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
