Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BELTON v. ESSEX COUNTY SHERRIFS DEPARTMENT, et al.
as 2:2020cv13344
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, BUREAU OF NARCOTICS and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP BELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv02160
Plaintiff:
VERNICE CLARK HOLMES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUIZ v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv03304
Plaintiff:
MARIANITO RUIZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , MCCABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEIL v. SULAYMAN et al
as 1:2013cv06033
Plaintiff:
STEVEN NEIL
Defendant:
SAMIR SULAYMAN, M.D., ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE, M.D., JOSE RAVAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DESIREE WHYTE AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN POITRAS et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH et al
as 3:2013cv05476
Plaintiff:
DESIREE WHYTE AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN POITRAS , DESIREE WHYTE and ESTATE OF JOHN POITRAS BY ITS GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX DESIREE WHYTE
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, MONMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SHERIFF SHAUN GOLDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BACON v. DR. MANDELL et al
as 3:2010cv05506
Plaintiff:
JOEL JERMAINE BACON
Defendant:
DR. MANDELL, JOHN DOE, MATT MOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2009cv01646
Plaintiff:
SHAHEED BROWN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
THE COUNTY OF ESSEX
ThirdParty Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and RICHARD ROES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
