Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon Johnson, et al
as 22-56152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden, CSPA LA COUNTY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv07216
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunigan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Rodriguez v. Raybon C. Johnson
as 2:2022cv06054
Petitioner:
Joe Rodriguez
Respondent:
Raybon C. Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manuel Sanchez v. Raybon Johnson
as 22-55695
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL RUBEN SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden
David Urias v. Stacy L. Lopez et al
as 2:2021cv09520
Plaintiff:
David Urias
Defendant:
Director C.D.C.R. Stacy L. Lopez, Warden Raybon C. Johnson, Jr., Correctional Officer E. Galvan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Brian Martin v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv11342
Plaintiff:
Richard Brian Martin and Searching Bear Martin
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson and Erica Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dion Martell King v. Raybon C. Johnson
as 5:2020cv02349
Petitioner:
Dion Martell King
Respondent:
Raybon C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reahdeen Robertson v. Raybon C. Johnson
as 2:2020cv09064
Petitioner:
Reahdeen Robertson
Respondent:
Raybon C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Darnell Bryant v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv03459
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sergio Montez, Kristina Estrada, Cori J. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Darnell Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
