Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Louisville et al
as 1:2024cv03228
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville and Publlic Affairs, Human Resources Victims Right Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willimas v. Louisville Metro Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv03225
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Detention Center, Chief Jailer, Public Affairs and Human Resources Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayala v. NYC Human Resources Administration et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ayala
Defendant:
NYC Human Resources Administration, Jamie Esparza, El Paso District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Herrera v. Banks et al
as 1:2017cv07691
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Herrera
Defendant:
Steven Banks, Iris Rodriguez, Jason Hansman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Escalera v. People of The State of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03661
Plaintiff:
William Escalera, Jr.
Defendant:
People of The State of New York, Samaritan Village Men's Shelter, Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ke'ish Mil'chamot v. Cuban Officer (John Doe) et al
as 1:2015cv09120
Plaintiff:
Yehudah Tziyon Ke'ish Mil'chamot
Defendant:
Cuban Officer (John Doe), Hispanic Woman Detective Jane Doe, (First name Unknown) Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daverne v. Daverne et al
as 1:2015cv06097
Plaintiff:
Ludovic Daverne, Jr.
Defendant:
Ludovic Daverne, Human Resources Adm. Local Offices 39 & 37, Dept. of Homeless Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
