Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brian Wilbur v. Richard Roth, et al
as 13-15770
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN ALBERT KELSEY WILBUR
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ROTH and MONROE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Kelsey Wilbur v. Roth et al
as 4:2013cv10146
Plaintiff:
Brian Albert Kelsey Wilbur
Defendant:
Richard Roth and Monroe County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roth v. Davis et al
as 3:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Richard Roth
Defendant:
Mr. Davis, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Gonzalize and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Bruce v. Penny Phelps, et al
as 10-14987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD BRUCE and ROBERT PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNY PHELPS, RICHARD ROTH, NURSE A and others
Bruce et al v. Phelps et al
as 4:2009cv10083
Plaintiff:
Donald Bruce and Robert Pierce
Defendant:
Penny Phelps, Richard Roth, Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Roth et al
as 4:2008cv10097
Plaintiff:
Ranse Gonzalez Castro
Defendant:
Richard Roth and Shawn Hernandez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shepard v. Roth et al
as 4:2008cv10034
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Shepard
Defendant:
Richard Roth, Keena Allen and Linda Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 4:2007cv10069
Plaintiff:
Isaac D Mason
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center and Richard Roth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker Harvey v. Department Of Corrections
as 4:2007cv10072
Plaintiff:
Ransey Robert Samuel Thacker Harvey
Defendant:
Department Of Corrections and Richard Roth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv10069
Plaintiff:
Isaac D Mason
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center and Richard Roth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
