Cases 1 - 10 of 214
Richardson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
James Kyle Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HENDERSON v. LANE et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT LANE, HARRIS, T WYATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkland v. Danzig et al
as 8:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Steven Kirkland
Defendant:
David Danzig, Scot Peterson, Jennifer Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Warden, USP Coleman I
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Weaver et al
as 6:2023cv02409
Plaintiff:
Jaleer S. Richardson
Defendant:
Sergeant B T. Weaver, Correctional Officer S. Aviles, Correctional Officer D Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. PARKE et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
TOMMY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
JASON PARKE, HARLEY and RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Justice Flowers
Defendant:
Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, Bob Gualtieri, Deputy L.T. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charles Richardson
Defendant:
Richard Dixon, J. Clemons, R. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickmon v. Blass et al
as 1:2023cv22400
Plaintiff:
Levory Hickmon
Defendant:
M. Blass, R. Garcia-Ortiz, Morano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
