Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Mendoza v. Donald et al
as 1:2016cv01471
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Mendoza
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray, L. Gale Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin Windelberg v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 14-11461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN WINDELBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, ALBERT R. MURRAY and others
Hill v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv04276
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windelberg v. Deal et al
as 1:2013cv02606
Plaintiff:
Edwin Windelberg
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Ga. Pardons & Paroles Members, Albert R. Murray and others
Dawud v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2012cv02928
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Bryant v. James Donald, et al
as 12-14334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. DONALD and ROBERT E. KELLER
Bryant v. Donald et al
as 1:2012cv02137
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Bryant
Defendant:
James E. Donald and Robert E. Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton et al v. State Bar of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Burton
Defendant:
State Bar of Georgia, Paula J. Frederick, John J. Shiptenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Donald et al
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Thurman L. Henderson, W. C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Hampton v. Commissioner, GA DOC, et al
as 11-16014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HAMPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, L. GALE BUCKNER and ROBERT E. KELLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
