Cases 1 - 10 of 12
EJONGA et al v. ROSENSTEIN et al
as 1:2017cv02813
Plaintiff:
JOJO DEOGRACIAS EJONGA, DEANTHONY FRANKS and LEE PATRICK-JOHNSON
Defendant:
ROD ROSENSTEIN, ROBERT MUELLER, ANDREW MCCABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAFARINI v. ASHCROFT et al
as 1:2017cv00430
Plaintiff:
ZAID HASSAN ABD LATIF SAFARINI
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, ROBERT MUELLER, BRAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv01065
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HOEY MORRIS
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO and ROBERT MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00386
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BURNES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv01338
Petitioner:
ELLYN J. BURNES
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BALLANCE v. PEEPLES et al
as 1:2010cv00864
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. BALLANCE
Defendant:
CARLTON L. PEEPLES and ROBERT MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HALL v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2009cv00711
Plaintiff:
MARK HALL
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER and UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LEE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2009cv00209
Plaintiff:
ALFRED WAYNE LEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MALLOUK et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv02003
Petitioner:
MONA MALLOUK and HOSSAM HEMDAN
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MICHAEL MUKASEY, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MINNFEE v. MUELLER
as 1:2008cv01731
Plaintiff:
BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
