Cases 1 - 10 of 352
EVANS v. ARCH
as 2:2024cv14158
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH, BROWN, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Derousseau v. Winter Haven Police Dept. et al
as 8:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Defendant:
Winter Haven Police Dept., Michael Kelly, Bruce Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. ARCH
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH
Respondent:
BROWN, RICKY DIXON and SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EVANS v. SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. RICK et al
as 3:2023cv24697
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROGERS
Defendant:
C RICK, PAUL LEVINS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moretto v. Warden Rogers et al
as 2:2023cv14315
Plaintiff:
Stephen Andrew Moretto
Defendant:
Warden Rogers, Warden Cox, R Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. Fernandez
as 8:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Roger Melton
Defendant:
Alejandro Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
