Cases 1 - 10 of 74
MUJICA v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LAURA ANNE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus Rose Jr. v. Stephen et al
as 2:2023cv14385
Plaintiff:
Augustus Rose Jr. and Cowboy, Tex
Defendant:
Noel E. Stephen and Huascar Oscar Moreira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIQUEZ-RABIN v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
ROSE RODRIGUEZ RABIN and ROSE RODRIGUEZ-RABIN
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BLACK v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
GALEN FOSTER BLACK
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO, T EASTER, ED GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rose v. Warden, Fort Dix FCI
as 1:2023cv20222
Plaintiff:
Lothario Dion Rose
Defendant:
Warden, Fort Dix FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Snipes v. Pavese et al
as 2:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Traymonte Birtanne Snipes
Defendant:
P. Pavese, R. Sutton and Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHESTNUT v. ROSE et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Defendant:
Amy Rose, JAMES CARTER, LUIS RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
GERNARD D CHESTNUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01291
Petitioner:
Ronald Rose
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rose v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00772
Petitioner:
Richard Wally Rose
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
