Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WILLIAMS v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant:
JANE DOE, R CONNORS, MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & ENT. Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01288
Defendant:
D. F. Manning, L. A. Ridd, Mr. S. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler et al v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Corintheus Seth Fowler and Arthur Mainor
Defendant:
Julie Jones, T. Bowden, S. B. Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyal v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Dyal
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, S. B. Rossitier, Jeffery Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyal v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Dyal
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, N. Jeffcoat, S. B. Rossitier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Diane Andrews, S. B. Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent. Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Defendant:
Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent. Inc., R. Yax, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv00397
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Solomon
Defendant:
Julie Jones, M. Millette, Diana Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Ceo,Past and Present Presidents Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent Ing. et al
as 3:2015cv01104
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Defendant:
Ceo,Past and Present Presidents Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent Ing., R. Yax, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Medical Staff et al
as 3:2015cv00543
Plaintiff:
Malcolm J Marshall, Sr
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Diane Andrews, S. B. Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
