Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wilson, Donald v. Bround et al
as 3:2013cv00781
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Wilson
Respondent:
Thomas H. Bround , David H. Schwarz and Mindy Sonnentag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman, Sidney et al v. Compton, David et al
as 3:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
Sidney Coleman and Lakesha M. Johnson
Defendant:
David Compton, Hanson, Tracie A. Jokala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv00847
Plaintiff:
Delano M Wade
Defendant:
Michael B Williams, Neil Thoreson, Bryan Balde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hashim, A'Kinbo v. Wall, Edward et al
as 3:2013cv00065
Petitioner:
A'Kinbo J.S. Hashim
Respondent:
Edward Wall and David H. Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson, Donald v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2011cv00725
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Wilson
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Karen E. Timberlake , Thomas H. Bowd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Schwarz et al
as 2:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
Chaz Smith
Defendant:
David H Schwarz , Rachel Pings, Lititia J Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L Thompson
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, David H Schwarz, Julia Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Moskonas et al
as 2:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Melvin Shelton
Defendant:
Sarah Moskonas and David H Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Schwarz
as 3:2010cv00090
Petitioner:
Daniel Z. Maldonado
Respondent:
David H. Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Radunz v. Schwarz et al
as 3:2009cv00168
Petitioner:
Randall Arthur Radunz
Respondent:
David H. Schwarz, J.B. Van Hollen and John M. O'Boyle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
