Cases 1 - 10 of 1,386
Sands v. Nocco
as 8:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Sands
Defendant:
Chris Nocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Long et al
as 8:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Chism
Defendant:
Janet C. Long, Brian Scott, Charles Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Perez-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Daontae T. Scott
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Christina Crews, R. Bassa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. WEEKS
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM SCOTT
Defendant:
NOLAN WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCatherian, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calisi v. Volusia County Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Calisi
Defendant:
Volusia County Department of Corrections, Mark A. Flowers, Scott DeEsposito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez, Jason T. v. Puentes et al
as 0:2024cv60740
Plaintiff:
Jason Tomas Fernandez
Defendant:
Yendi Puentes, Mathew Correa, Scott Shammil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Harris et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Solomon Roberts
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Emily Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calisi v. COUNTY OF VOLUSIA et al
as 6:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Calisi
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VOLUSIA and SCOTT D'ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
