Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrera et al v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr., Tyron Dyeralle Davis, Cesar Rueda and others
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrera v. Seaton et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge R Shane Seaton, Stan Parker, Hardy L Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02849
Petitioner:
Larry Author Mills
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Defendant:
Moises Villalobos and Keauna Seaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Bryant
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Det. #2230 FNU Seaton, #2101 R. Valadez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Seaton et al
as 5:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Bryant
Defendant:
J. Seaton, J. Martin, C. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaton v. McLennan County Jail
as 6:2020cv01119
Defendant:
McLennan County Jail
Plaintiff:
Abdul Seaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaton v. McLennon County Jail
as 7:2020cv00280
Defendant:
McLennon County Jail
Plaintiff:
Abdul Seaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
