Cases 1 - 10 of 2,479
M v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
C M
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Ray J. Garcia and Darrell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gooden v. Eaton et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Charles Gooden
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, Steve Smith and C. Keo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Daniels v. Garcia, et al
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Daniels
Defendant:
A. Garcia, G. Vega, A. Pola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Grzeslo v. Phillips, et al.
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
James Grzeslo
Defendant:
Bryan D. Phillips, Idalberto Zaldivar-Galves, N. Scaife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dale William Watson
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Javier Pellecer v. S. Smith
as 2:2024cv04067
Petitioner:
Javier Pellecer
Respondent:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of California
as 5:2024cv02761
Plaintiff:
Leslie Rosalee Smith
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Scroggins v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Scroggins
Defendant:
Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
