Cases 1 - 10 of 626
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06010
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv04425
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL J. RIVERA
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY, EUGENE CALDWELL, II, CUMBERLAND COUNTY INSURANCE COMM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIMMELREICH v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Petitioner:
WALTER HIMMELREICH
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON and K. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv23179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLAZO v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv22777
Plaintiff:
ISHAWN A. COLLAZO
Defendant:
D. SMITH, MR. PATTERSON and SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENTZ v. DILL et al
as 3:2023cv22490
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
RYAN DILL, LOUIS DEDONNO, DAVID SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 3:2023cv21570
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SMITH
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERBERT v. ASSOCIATE WARDEN et al
as 2:2023cv21377
Plaintiff:
OLAJUWON HERBERT
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN, WARDEN, REGINA MARROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2023cv20593
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. SMITH
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
