Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Coulter v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00628
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Germaine Coulter, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sherfield et al v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sherfield, Sr, Leslie R Loyd, Taufano CT Guyton and others
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sledge v. Grady County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Traydon Ladarian Sledge and Traydon Ladorian Sledge, Sr.
Defendant:
Grady County Sheriff, Jim Peek and Jim Girlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Sharp et al
as 5:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Dylan Fuller, Sr.
Defendant:
Tommy Sharp and FNU Lorentez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Root v. USA
as 6:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Levi Cody Root, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Florie v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Dondrea Jammal Florie, Sr.
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Henson v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00348
Petitioner:
Anthony B Henson, Sr
Respondent:
Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. USA
as 6:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Whitaker, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Steven Jermaine Harris, Sr and Steven Jermaine Harris, Sr.
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Steven Jermaine Harris, Sr
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
