Cases 1 - 10 of 405
VILLALONA v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv06696
Petitioner:
STEVEN VILLALONA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PEREZ v. MERENDINO
as 1:2024cv06508
Petitioner:
MARCO PEREZ
Respondent:
STEVEN MERENDINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEVENS v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
CALVIN STEVENS
Respondent:
CHARLES ELLIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CASTRO and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOKMAN v. KEATING et al
as 1:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BOOKMAN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KEATING, TIMOTHY STEINMETZ, JORGE A. RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOKMAN v. CARSTARPHEN et al
as 1:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BOOKMAN
Defendant:
MAYOR VIC CARSTARPHEN, GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ, DET. COLIN LEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUSTO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
