Cases 1 - 10 of 97
PIERCE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02296
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAMALA D. HARRIS, VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS
as 1:2017cv02299
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seavon Pierce v. U.S. Congre
as 16-17025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. CONGRESS
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv08010
Defendant:
Pierce V. Gonzales, Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, President Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2016cv02055
Plaintiff:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEDERAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION, DANE R. GILLETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02058
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, KAMALA D. HARRIS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv07556
Defendant:
Attorney General Kamala Harris, The California Department Corrections, The U.S. Government and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. Sacramento News and Review, et al
as 16-16740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO NEWS AND REVIEW, MODESTO BEE, NEW YORK TIMES NEWS and others
Seavon Pierce v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 16-16722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, ANTHONY DA SILVA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Pierce v. McDermott et al
as 1:2016cv01281
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
John E. McDermott and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
