Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wood v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Michael Wood
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Deanna Williamson, Freda Adu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dover v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Domenic Dover
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners, Armond Budish, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Conkle v. Shaw
as 4:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conkle
Defendant:
Alan Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conkle v. Shaw
as 2:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conkle
Defendant:
Alan Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Shaw et al
as 4:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILING ERROR.
as 4:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Shaw et al
as 2:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elkins v. Franklin Medical Center, et al.
as 2:2022cv03705
Plaintiff:
David Elkins
Defendant:
Franklin Medical Center, Warden Pickaway Correctional Institution, Warden K. Jeter Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Sproul, et al.
as 4:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Courtney Curtis
Defendant:
Counselor Jarrett, Lt. Brooks, Ms. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnpillai v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
Jessie Johnpillai
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Harold May, Charlotte Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
