Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Hughes v. Judge Ana Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04478
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Judge Ana Martinez, Bryan Collier, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv04281
Plaintiff:
Cedric Brown
Defendant:
Sherrif Ed Gonzalez, Inmate Bank and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03580
Petitioner:
Cameron Jonarin Barnes and Cameron Jon Barnes
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguirre v. Sherriff Ed Gonzales et al
as 4:2023cv03440
Plaintiff:
David Aguirre
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Nurse Practitioner Ewurmle, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myles v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv01842
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Myles
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shell v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2022cv03160
Plaintiff:
Robert Noble Shell
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Mr or Mrs. Jon Doe, Dr. Jon or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 4:2022cv03048
Plaintiff:
Andre DeCarl Thompson
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Gonzalez
as 4:2022cv03027
Petitioner:
Larry Wayne Sanford
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Routt v. Gonzalez
as 4:2022cv02758
Petitioner:
David Lee Routt
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2022cv02484
Petitioner:
Frankie Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
