Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Simms v. Warden, Grafton Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Timothy Simms
Respondent:
Warden, Grafton Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rahman v. Hanson et al
as 3:2016cv02484
Plaintiff:
Manni Muhammad Rahman
Defendant:
Hanson, P. Shaw, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Houglan et al
as 1:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Simms
Defendant:
Todd Houglan, David Hannah and Dr. Eddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Butler County Sheriff's Office Corrections Division
as 1:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Brian H Simms
Defendant:
Butler County Sheriff's Office Corrections Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Mohr et al
as 1:2015cv01375
Plaintiff:
Reginald Gibson
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Brigham Sloan, Jeffery Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Gary C Mohr, Gary R. Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simms v. USA
as 1:2010cv01396
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Antrown T. Simms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hillman v. Simms et al
as 2:2008cv00717
Plaintiff:
Robert L Hillman
Defendant:
Brian Simms, W. Joseph Edwards, Jennifer Maloon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Koger v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv03438
Plaintiff:
Cecil Koger
Defendant:
Stuart Hudson, Gary Simms and Terry Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenberg v. Hill et al
as 2:2007cv01076
Plaintiff:
Steven M Greenberg
Defendant:
Judy Hill, Chris Hill, Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
