Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Spencer v. USA
as 1:2024cv01203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Norman Bruce Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McElmeel v. Perlow et al
as 6:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Samuel Peter McElmeel
Defendant:
Patricia W. Perlow, Eric T Knapp, Spencer Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrett v. Harrold
as 6:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Spencer Joseph Barrett
Respondent:
Sheriff Clifton Harrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Harrold
as 6:2023cv00738
Petitioner:
Spencer Joseph Barrett
Respondent:
Sheriff Clifton Harrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. State of Oregon
as 2:2018cv00126
Petitioner:
Antwaun Leshawn Spencer
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richmond v. Ives et al
as 3:2017cv01646
Defendant:
Melrina Blue, Troy Esera, Micheal Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackketter v. Taylor
as 2:2015cv02406
Petitioner:
Spencer Dean Blackketter
Unknown:
Lisa Hay and Lynn David Larsen
Respondent:
Jeri Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00132
Defendant:
Cpl. Akers, B. Anana, Archer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Benson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairley v. Shelton et al
as 2:2014cv00030
Defendant:
Kenneth Becker, Daniel Dewsnup, C. DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Fairley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bisby v. Shelton et al
as 2:2012cv01040
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, Dr. DiGiulo, Dr. Diehl and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn N. Bisby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
