Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Adams v. Fabrizio et al
as 0:2024cv60303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Fabrizio, Sergeant Steve Lambert, Detective Eddy Velazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXON v. DYKES et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES DIXON, JR
Defendant:
TRAVIS EARL DYKES, JONATHAN L CARTER, TYLER MARIE MCCRANIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villafana v. Marshall et al
as 8:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Villafana
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Nicki M. McFerrin, Justin Louvorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRING v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
STEVE HERRING
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. GIBBS et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE GIBBS, BATCHELOR, MURRAY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS-DAVIS et al v. HAND
as 5:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MEARS-DAVIS and STEVE MEARS
Defendant:
CARLA A HAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PELLETIER v. GAINESVILLE POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PELLETIER
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE POLICE, FLORIDA STATE ATTORNEY and STEVE BRISTOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Collinsworth et al
as 6:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Jessie Owen Curtis
Defendant:
Danielle Collinsworth, Mark Lambardi, Steve Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Whidden et al
as 2:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ransom Louis Collins
Defendant:
Steve Whidden, Reyes, Lieutenant Larkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
