Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. STEWART et al
as 1:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
STEWART, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC FLORIDA, BROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CRAWFORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL and UNKNOWN NAMED TRUST FUND SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMONSON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2017cv01414
Plaintiff:
KENNY EDMONSON
Defendant:
GLORIA STEVENS, RANDY JOHNSON, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAL v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv02135
Plaintiff:
SHAUNDELLE DONTIA DIAL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., GENERAL COUNSEL OF B.O.P., OIG OF B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH v. RIPPLE et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN RIPPLE, INTAKE COUNSEL, SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREELY-BEY v. COURT SERVICES SUPERVISOR et al
as 1:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
ERNEST M. GREELY-BEY
Defendant:
COURT SERVICES SUPERVISOR, ANDERSON, C. BENTELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALEY v. HALEY et al
as 1:2008cv01264
Plaintiff:
ROMEO R. HALEY
Defendant:
LESTER HALEY, SR., LESTER HALEY, JR., ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GOMIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00972
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE GOMIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BANKS v. BRATCHER et al
as 1:2008cv00174
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
BRATCHER, WRIGHT, MUCUTCHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
