Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MOORE v. NARDELLI et al
as 3:2019cv16468
Respondent:
ERIN NARDELLI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
LEROY T MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2018cv12911
Petitioner:
EARL T. MOORE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. BUECHELE et al
as 3:2015cv01436
Petitioner:
LEROY T. MOORE
Respondent:
ROBERT BUECHELE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv05585
Petitioner:
LEROY T. MOORE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ROBERT BUECHELE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. CARTERET POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv00943
Plaintiff:
LEROY T. MOORE
Defendant:
CARTERET POLICE DEPT. , LOUIS REYES , MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE and others
Cross_claimant:
LOUIS REYES and MICHAEL DAMMANN
Cross_defendant:
BOROUGH OF CARTERET , CARTERET POLICE DEPT. , COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2011cv03879
Plaintiff:
LEROY T. MOORE
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, CHRISTOPHER KUBERIET, JENNIFER SESSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. DOW et al
as 2:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
LEROY T. MOORE
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, BRUCE KAPLAN , VALERIE LISPANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. DOW et al
as 3:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
LEROY T. MOORE
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, BRUCE KAPLAN , VALERIE LISPANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KWANZAA v. MEE et al
as 2:2009cv05132
Plaintiff:
CHAKA KWANZAA
Defendant:
DONALD MEE, JR., PAUL, R. LAFORGIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
