Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Bowman v. City of Fairview Park et al
as 1:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Ted Bowman
Defendant:
City of Fairview Park, City of North Olmsted, Matthew Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Folmar v. State of Ohio, Commissioner Office Franklin Count et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Ian L Folmar
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Commissioner Office Franklin Count, Prosecutor Zach Klein's Office, Judge Ted Barrows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Anderson v. Barrows et al
as 2:2019cv04001
Defendant:
Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County Sheriff's Department, Sgt Lewis Schrader and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Barrows et al
as 2:2019cv03631
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe Classification Office, Sgt Lewis Schrader, Franklin County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcum v. Duchak et al
as 3:2017cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ted Marcum
Defendant:
Dave Duchak , Rob Davie , Stacy Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marcum v. Duchak et al
as 1:2017cv00853
Plaintiff:
Ted Marcum
Defendant:
Dave Duchak , Rob Davie , Stacy Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 2:2016cv01126
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. USA
as 4:2016cv00413
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ted Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
