Cases 1 - 10 of 37
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v BIDEN et al.
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELDRIDGE v. BLANKENSU
as 1:2020cv01009
Respondent:
BOON BLANKENSU
Petitioner:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BAHRAMPOUR v. UNITED STATES SENATORS et al
as 1:2020cv00800
Defendant:
JIMMY CARTER, UNITED STATES SENATORS, UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHEPHARD v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv01810
Defendant:
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., DICK CHENEY, SHERROD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELDRIDGE v. MOTLEY et al
as 1:2018cv01660
Respondent:
NANCY R. PAGE, JOHN DOES, THOMAS J. MOTLEY and others
Petitioner:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
STRONG v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2017cv02446
Plaintiff:
DYRIAN STRONG
Defendant:
MARY LOU ROBINSON and CLINTON E. AVERITTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITHERS v. SMITHERS-THOMAS et al
as 1:2017cv01934
Plaintiff:
BOICE F. SMITHERS, JR.
Defendant:
BRENNA J. SMITHERS-THOMAS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, U.S. NAVY DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVE et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE, VINCENT DALE ROSS and DYRIAN STRONG
Defendant:
MARY LOU ROBINSON, CLINTON AVERITTE, BARBARA MELYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILBOURN v. CLINTON
as 1:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MILBOURN
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, GEORGE SORROS and NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
