Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Green v. Gunthar et al
as 1:2022cv01437
Defendant:
. Fisher, . Gunthar, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv02661
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, United States and Dept. of Justice
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denault v. Dept of Justice et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Defendant:
D. Sproul, USP Marion, Dept of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin S. Denault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv05941
Plaintiff:
Albert Louis Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice , U.S. Parole Commission , Randell Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swayzer v. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv03896
Plaintiff:
Gregory Swayzer
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice , Thomas Dart and Toni Preckwinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv01542
Petitioner:
Earl Lee Wright
Respondent:
U.S. Dept of Justice, Illinois Dept. of Corret., Michael P. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howell v. Swain et al
as 2:2014cv02008
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Sue Swain, Harmony Goorley, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Walsh et al
as 2:2013cv02153
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Dan Walsh, Carol Ammons, Julia Rietz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minneman v. US Attorney General Dept of Justice
as 1:2012cv01429
Petitioner:
Joseph C Minneman
Defendant:
US Attorney General Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2010cv03883
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Edwards
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
