Cases 1 - 10 of 3,743
O'Neil v. Cermak Health Service et al
as 1:2024cv04957
Plaintiff:
Christopher O'Neil
Defendant:
Cermak Health Service, Thomas Dart, Robert O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04958
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanfond v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04828
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Lanfond
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01457
Petitioner:
James Powell
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nance v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01444
Petitioner:
James Lawrence Nance
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milons v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04620
Plaintiff:
Deandree Milons
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Correctional Sergeant Williams and John/Jane Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold III v. Raoul et al
as 1:2024cv04614
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Thomas J. Dart, J.B. Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trice v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04538
Plaintiff:
Sammy O. Trice
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cermak Medical Service/Staff and Cook County Div. 8 Classifications Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, John Doe 1, Susan Shobol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Jail/D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv04517
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Jail/D.O.C., Deputy Manzella, Response Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
