Cases 1 - 10 of 245
HARRIS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv09391
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARMAINE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVIS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv09371
Respondent:
FCI FORT DIX and WARDEN THOMPSON
Petitioner:
KWAMAINE LAMONT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AGUILERA-RIOS v. THOMPSON
as 2:2024cv09370
Respondent:
MRS. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
PABLO AGUILERA-RIOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS, III v. THOMPSON
as 3:2024cv09374
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv09294
Petitioner:
JAMES EMORY JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv09295
Respondent:
FCI FORT DIX and WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
RYAN SHEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FIGUEROA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv09301
Petitioner:
JOSE FIGUEROA
Respondent:
MRS. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DESPOSITO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2024cv09263
Defendant:
WILKS, JOHNSON, NURSE BONISLAWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
SONNY DESPOSITIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2024cv09034
Petitioner:
MARCUS HENDERSON
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON and FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv08949
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON and FCI FORT DIX
Petitioner:
MARSHALL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
