Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pinner v. Fox et al
as 4:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Pinner
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Joel Thompson, Daniel Guzynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fox et al
as 4:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Smith
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Mike McGrath and County Attorneys, County and Municipal Magistrates, and the State District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Fox et al
as 4:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Keith Doyle
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Mike McGrath and County Attorneys, County and Municipal Magistrates, and the State District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clary v. Fox et al
as 4:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Charles Clary
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Mike McGrath and County Attorneys, County and Municipal Magistrates, and the State District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer et al v. Fox et al
as 4:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ronald Archer
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Mike McGrath and County Attorneys, County and Municipal Magistrates, and the State District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Fox et al
as 4:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
John W. Chambers
Defendant:
Timothy Fox, Mike McGrath and County Attorneys, County and Municipal Magistrates, and the State District Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenfield v. Fender et al
as 4:2016cv00119
Petitioner:
Kal Kenfield
Respondent:
Douglas Fender and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Fox et al
as 9:2016cv00144
Petitioner:
Larry Dewayne Adams
Respondent:
Timothy Fox and Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Giddings v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2016cv00026
Petitioner:
Joshua David Giddings
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Kirkegard et al
as 2:2015cv00055
Petitioner:
Jose Danniel Ramirez
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Timothy Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
