Cases 1 - 10 of 20
MILLER-EVANS v. FAUST et al
as 1:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EVANS-MILLER
Defendant:
TOM FAUST and WANDA PATTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. WHEELER
as 1:2016cv01913
Petitioner:
HEATHER MOORE
Respondent:
TOM WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C. ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JANET RENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMM v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv01429
Plaintiff:
ANCELL HAMM
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON, TOM CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARAGON v. FOLEY et al
as 1:2010cv01588
Defendant:
DAVID W. FOLEY, RYAN BRACKLEY, THOMAS J. CURRY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JOHN ARAGON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULEIMAN v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv01411
Petitioner:
FAYIZ AHMAD YAHIA SULEIMAN
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT GATES, STEVEN BLAISDELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAMBALI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Petitioner:
RIDUAN BIN ISOMUDDIN HAMBALI
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT GATES, STEVEN BLAISDELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
