Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JORDAN v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv01478
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and MICHAEL D. CARVAJAL
Plaintiff:
MARK JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
JONES et al v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv00524
Petitioner:
MACEO JONES and SALLIE JONES
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANGELA DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01190
Plaintiff:
JASON THOMPSON
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNKNOWN, E. NEGRON-OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRELAND v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00988
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JEFFERSON BRELAND
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00835
Petitioner:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Respondent:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and RAYMOND BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DONELSON v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DONELSON
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURMAN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01747
Petitioner:
ALLAH A. BURMAN
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIVERA v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO RIVERA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUCKETT v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv01521
Petitioner:
PHILLIP ERIC DUCKETT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES , U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR and D.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
