Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gross v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2019cv02308
Respondent:
No Named Respondents, B.O.P., Executive Director of Colorado Dept. of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
William D. Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Goodface v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv01884
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Goddface and Richard Lee Goodface
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals, U.S. Attorney General and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Mejia v. U.S. Marshals Service et al.
as 1:2018cv00313
Petitioner:
Frances Antonia Amador Mejia
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Geo Aurora Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ray v. Denham et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Petitioner:
Austin Ray
Respondent:
Deborah Denham and U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Villasenor v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03101
Plaintiff:
Domingo Villasenor
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Sanchez and U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villasenor v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03493
Plaintiff:
Domingo Villasenor
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Sanchez and U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garewal v. U.S. Marshall et al
as 1:2012cv02348
Plaintiff:
Milton Bradley Garewal
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall, Crum, (I) Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 1:2011cv00079
Petitioner:
Carl L. Wilson
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2009cv02967
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ray Cook
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zani v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 1:2009cv00052
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Zani
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Texas Board of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
