Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Paulk v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv14313
Plaintiff:
Reginald Andrew Paulk
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, David Randall, Thomas Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBose v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2022cv01836
Petitioner:
Virgil DeBose and Virgil Eugene DeBose
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARLOW v. FOUNTAIN
as 3:2020cv05805
Defendant:
GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, SUSAN PRIDDY and ERIC ESMOND
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL WAYNE BARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbati v. Flowers et al
as 6:2019cv02275
Defendant:
Unknown Supervisor and Virgil Flowers
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Barbati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. BOOKER et al
as 3:2018cv00496
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JEROME RANDALL
Defendant:
BOOKER, LEE, MCCULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2017cv81094
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Peggy Virgil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hataway v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01644
Petitioner:
James Virgil Hataway
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Talley v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2015cv00311
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Petitioner:
Virgil Talley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Virgil v. Tramonte
as 6:2015cv00657
Plaintiff:
Tony Virgil
Defendant:
Kyle Tramonte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. STAPP
as 1:2013cv00247
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STAPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
