Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Singletary v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv03446
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Dr. Theresa May, Ken Paxton and others
Petitioner:
Charleston Singletary
In Re:
Australia Jones
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Guthrie et al
as 6:2019cv00026
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Randy Guthrie, Vince Guthrie and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Guthrie et al
as 2:2019cv00101
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Randy Guthrie, Vince Guthrie and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Hierholzer et al
as 5:2017cv01112
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bailey
Defendant:
W.R. "Rusty" Hierholzer, Vince Isley and Shelby Palermo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv03696
Petitioner:
Vince Slade Jackson
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00262
Petitioner:
Vince Arthur Hall
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00263
Petitioner:
Vince Arthur Hall
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chiles v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00165
Petitioner:
Vince Vernard Chiles
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Guthrie et al
as 6:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Ray Parker
Defendant:
Vince Guthrie, Randy Guthrie and FNU Pearce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Vince et al
as 6:2012cv00054
Defendant:
Kendal Caldwell, France Freeland, Major FNU Marez and others
Plaintiff:
Orlon Jerome Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
