Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Muhammad Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Al-Akhir Islam Muhammad Bryant
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv10569
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia and F.C.I. Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. US District Court et al
as 1:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
US District Court, David J. Novak, Mark R. Colombell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilburn v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2023cv04082
Plaintiff:
Andre Wilburn
Defendant:
Virginia Nguyen, Robert Polemeni, Andrew Grubin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Common Wealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
Common Wealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Sheriff Quiroz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lallave v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2022cv04136
Petitioner:
Virginia Lallave
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Patrick McFarland
Defendant:
DHO Officer Patrick McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lallave v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Virginia Lallave
Defendant:
F. Martinez, Jr., Michael Carvajal and DHO Officer Patrick McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blanco v. United States of America
as 7:2021cv05063
Plaintiff:
Virginia Blanco
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Poulson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv02059
Defendant:
R&B Corporation of Virginia and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shannon Poulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
